Artificial Christmas Tree Vs Real Christmas Tree

A 2018 study by acta on the life cycles of real and artificial christmas trees concluded that artificial trees show a more favorable environmental impact when reused for at least five years.

Artificial christmas tree vs real christmas tree. Are fake christmas trees bad for the environment. In line with a survey performed by the american christmas tree affiliation acta in. Higher for the atmosphere.

Although manufacturers spray them with fire retardants they can still ignite. Some love the magic of their artificial trees so much they keep them up nearly year round. This doesn t even factor in the costs of tree stands and lights typically included with an artificial tree but sold separately with a real tree.

In biloxi miss amy rosonet lebert s tree stays up well past christmas so she can switch out. Dried out real christmas trees are an obvious fire hazard but so are artificial trees. Which is best in case you re making an attempt to save cash in the course of the holidays.

Over time artificial trees collect dust which can be highly flammable. Actual christmas tree or synthetic tree. Real trees help fight climate change and even though your christmas tree is cut down you re actually supporting forests.

According to a life cycle assessment of the comparative environmental impacts of both real and fake christmas trees the wap sustainability consulting company concluded that one real christmas tree generates fewer environmental impacts than one artificial tree however a fake christmas tree can have a smaller negative impact on the environment if the customer keeps it for five years or longer. National tree company 6 5 foot feel real jersey fraser slim fir artificial christmas tree 240 46. A 2011 nielsen survey found the average cost of a real christmas tree was 46 compared to 78 for an artificial tree meaning reusing the artificial tree a second year will save money.

More on that later.